Compare methods and findings with those of others, recognise possible sources of error, pose questions for further investigation and select evidence to draw reasoned conclusions

Students compare methods and data sets, identify random and systematic error possibilities, judge whether differences are meaningful and write conclusions supported by evidence and bounded by limitations.

Differences in findings can arise from natural variation, measurement uncertainty, uncontrolled variables or method errors and require investigation rather than automatic rejection.

Group C’s different lamp distance is a systematic method difference that can explain its larger temperature rise.

Error does not mean dishonesty. It describes uncertainty or bias introduced by instrument, method, environment or recording.

Learning routine: Observe → Model → Investigate → Analyse → Explain → Evaluate

Success looks like

• Identify system components
• Explain relationships with a model
• Use evidence from a fair method
• Apply to a new context
• Evaluate limits and further questions

Content description: compare methods and findings with those of others, recognise possible sources of error, pose questions for further investigation and select evidence to draw reasoned conclusions.

• E1: comparing methods and findings with those of others to determine if the investigation was a fair test
• E2: recognising errors that could have occurred during investigations including changing too many variables, incorrect or misreading of measurements, or changes in environmental factors
• E3: comparing, in small groups, proposed reasons for findings and explaining their reasoning and posing further questions
• E4: discussing the difference between data and evidence and examining how evidence is selected
• E5: reflecting on inferences made from observations and analysis of the data to draw a reasoned conclusion

Core idea: Differences in findings can arise from natural variation, measurement uncertainty, uncontrolled variables or method errors and require investigation rather than automatic rejection.

Remember

• Identify system components
• Explain relationships with a model
• Use evidence from a fair method
• Apply to a new context
• Evaluate limits and further questions

Important questions

• Compare group methods. Explain using the model or evidence above.
• Identify systematic error. Explain using the model or evidence above.
• Describe random variation. Explain using the model or evidence above.
• Decide whether to combine data. Explain using the model or evidence above.
• Write a limited conclusion. Explain using the model or evidence above.

• Different result equals mistake — Variation may be expected.
• Outlier removed without reason — Investigate and document decision.
• Systematic error fixed by averaging — A biased method remains biased.
• Conclusion stronger than evidence — Use cautious scope and conditions.

Learn from the Topic Guide and fixed Teacher Slides, complete the Practice Sheet, use Practice for supported feedback, then take the Test when ready.

Students compare methods and data sets, identify random and systematic error possibilities, judge whether differences are meaningful and write conclusions supported by evidence and bounded by limitations.

Differences in findings can arise from natural variation, measurement uncertainty, uncontrolled variables or method errors and require investigation rather than automatic rejection.

Group C’s different lamp distance is a systematic method difference that can explain its larger temperature rise.

Error does not mean dishonesty. It describes uncertainty or bias introduced by instrument, method, environment or recording.

Learning routine: Observe → Model → Investigate → Analyse → Explain → Evaluate

Success looks like

• Identify system components
• Explain relationships with a model
• Use evidence from a fair method
• Apply to a new context
• Evaluate limits and further questions

Australian Curriculum Version 9.0

Teach this topic step by step

Explore optional teaching slide packs for classroom lessons and explanations at home.

Browse Teach & Explain · Browse Print & Go

Teachers: follow SkillrHub on TPT, then email us to request a free sample before buying. Include the year, subject and topic or curriculum code.

Request a free sample

After trying the sample, honest feedback is welcome. A TPT review is optional, where available, and does not need to be positive.