Students compare methods and data sets, identify random and systematic error possibilities, judge whether differences are meaningful and write conclusions supported by evidence and bounded by limitations.
Differences in findings can arise from natural variation, measurement uncertainty, uncontrolled variables or method errors and require investigation rather than automatic rejection.
Group C’s different lamp distance is a systematic method difference that can explain its larger temperature rise.
Error does not mean dishonesty. It describes uncertainty or bias introduced by instrument, method, environment or recording.
Learning routine: Observe → Model → Investigate → Analyse → Explain → Evaluate
Success looks like
- Identify system components
- Explain relationships with a model
- Use evidence from a fair method
- Apply to a new context
- Evaluate limits and further questions