Year 7 Science · AC9S7I07

Construct evidence-based arguments to support conclusions or evaluate claims and consider ethical issues and cultural protocols when using secondary information

Build arguments from evidence, judge source credibility, qualify conclusions, and use First Nations knowledge respectfully and ethically

Ready to project and teach

Learning goalsSay it simply

1. Construct evidence-based arguments (E1)

Start with a testable hypothesis or claim. Decide whether the evidence supports, challenges or is insufficient to decide. Select relevant evidence, then explain the scientific reasoning that links it to the conclusion. Avoid saying a hypothesis is “proved” by one investigation.

2. Draw logical conclusions from evidence quality (E2)

Before making a broad conclusion, examine how the data were collected, sample size, uncontrolled variables, measurement quality, duration, missing evidence and uncertainty. A strong conclusion matches the scope of the evidence.

3. Determine source credibility (E3)

Credibility is not decided by one feature alone. Check authorship or responsible organisation, expertise, evidence, methods or references, publication date, publisher, purpose, possible bias, and whether claims can be traced to original evidence.

SOURCE CREDIBILITY CHECK✓ Who created it?✓ What evidence?✓ Can it be traced?✓ When published?✓ Purpose / bias?✓ Limits acknowledged?
No source is credible simply because it is recent, official-looking or popular. Evaluate the evidence and context.

4. Megafauna extinction debate (E4)

Students investigate cultural, historical, archaeological, fossil and climate evidence used in debate about Australian megafauna extinction. The goal is not to memorise a single cause. Compare what each line of evidence supports, where it is limited, and whether conclusions are local or broad.

Archaeological
occupation sites, artefacts, dating and evidence of possible human–megafauna overlap
Fossil
extinction timelines, species distributions and dated remains
Climate
drying, rainfall and environmental change records
First Nations knowledge
appropriately sourced oral histories and cultural knowledge, used with relevant authority and protocols

Balanced conclusion: evidence may support several interacting explanations; uncertainty should be acknowledged rather than hidden.

5. Ethical use and commercialisation of First Nations knowledge (E5)

First Nations knowledges are diverse, place-based and culturally governed. Responsible research or commercial use should identify the relevant knowledge holders and follow appropriate cultural authority, consent, attribution, intellectual-property arrangements and benefit-sharing. Do not assume information is free to use simply because it appears in a secondary source.

AUTHORITYWho can speak/share?CONSENTIs use agreed?ATTRIBUTIONWho is acknowledged?BENEFIT-SHARINGAre outcomes fair?
Ethical use is a relationship and governance issue, not just a citation format.
Key conceptTeach from the board
Clean visual examplesOne-page board

Clean one-page examples

AC9S7I07 - Construct evidence-based arguments to support conclusions or evaluate claims and consider ethical issues and cultural protocols when using secondary information
Example 1

AC9S7I06 — Analyse methods, conclusions and claims

Example 2

AC9S7I06 — Analyse methods, conclusions and claims

Example 3

AC9S7I06 — Analyse methods, conclusions and claims

Curriculum examplesCopied content
Questions and answersWith answers
Practice and reviewReady for practice
Curriculum alignmentStart here

1. Construct evidence-based arguments (E1)

Start with a testable hypothesis or claim. Decide whether the evidence supports, challenges or is insufficient to decide. Select relevant evidence, then explain the scientific reasoning that links it to the conclusion. Avoid saying a hypothesis is “proved” by one investigation.

2. Draw logical conclusions from evidence quality (E2)

Before making a broad conclusion, examine how the data were collected, sample size, uncontrolled variables, measurement quality, duration, missing evidence and uncertainty. A strong conclusion matches the scope of the evidence.

3. Determine source credibility (E3)

Credibility is not decided by one feature alone. Check authorship or responsible organisation, expertise, evidence, methods or references, publication date, publisher, purpose, possible bias, and whether claims can be traced to original evidence.

SOURCE CREDIBILITY CHECK✓ Who created it?✓ What evidence?✓ Can it be traced?✓ When published?✓ Purpose / bias?✓ Limits acknowledged?
No source is credible simply because it is recent, official-looking or popular. Evaluate the evidence and context.

4. Megafauna extinction debate (E4)

Students investigate cultural, historical, archaeological, fossil and climate evidence used in debate about Australian megafauna extinction. The goal is not to memorise a single cause. Compare what each line of evidence supports, where it is limited, and whether conclusions are local or broad.

Archaeological
occupation sites, artefacts, dating and evidence of possible human–megafauna overlap
Fossil
extinction timelines, species distributions and dated remains
Climate
drying, rainfall and environmental change records
First Nations knowledge
appropriately sourced oral histories and cultural knowledge, used with relevant authority and protocols

Balanced conclusion: evidence may support several interacting explanations; uncertainty should be acknowledged rather than hidden.

5. Ethical use and commercialisation of First Nations knowledge (E5)

First Nations knowledges are diverse, place-based and culturally governed. Responsible research or commercial use should identify the relevant knowledge holders and follow appropriate cultural authority, consent, attribution, intellectual-property arrangements and benefit-sharing. Do not assume information is free to use simply because it appears in a secondary source.

AUTHORITYWho can speak/share?CONSENTIs use agreed?ATTRIBUTIONWho is acknowledged?BENEFIT-SHARINGAre outcomes fair?
Ethical use is a relationship and governance issue, not just a citation format.
Teach & ExplainTeaching slides and samples

Teach this topic step by step

Explore optional teaching slide packs for classroom lessons and explanations at home.

Browse Teach & Explain · Browse Print & Go

Teachers: follow SkillrHub on TPT, then email us to request a free sample before buying. Include the year, subject and topic or curriculum code.

Request a free sample

After trying the sample, honest feedback is welcome. A TPT review is optional, where available, and does not need to be positive.