Step 1: Explicit Teaching & Modelling
Define the outcome-specific metalanguage (language, visual, multimodal) and model how to identify the feature, select evidence and explain or use it.
AC9E7LA02 • Year 7 English
recognise language used to evaluate texts including visual and multimodal texts, and how evaluations of a text can be substantiated by reference to the text and other sources
Report issueStudents learn to recognise language used to evaluate texts including visual and multimodal texts, and how evaluations of a text can be substantiated by reference to the text and other sources. They identify precise evidence and explain or evaluate how a language, structural, literary or multimodal choice shapes meaning, representation, audience response or purpose. Key concepts include language, visual, multimodal, character, evidence.
Learning target: recognise language used to evaluate texts including visual and multimodal texts, and how evaluations of a text can be substantiated by reference to the text and other sources
Define the outcome-specific metalanguage (language, visual, multimodal) and model how to identify the feature, select evidence and explain or use it.
Work through a second example together: What is the choice or feature? Where is the evidence? What does it do here?
Students annotate, compare, read, edit, speak or compose with a fresh example, then apply the concept independently.
Use an unseen micro-text, oral task or creation task. Require precise evidence plus a justified explanation or deliberate crafting choice.
Move from “I liked the story” to “I found the ending effective because the repeated warning built suspense.” The second response gives a judgement and evidence.
Compare “might help”, “should help” and “will help”. The modal choice changes how certain or forceful the claim sounds.
“The brilliant new playground is exciting” evaluates; “the playground opened on Monday” reports a checkable fact. Discuss why a writer may choose either.
Students underline one evaluative word in a fresh sentence, replace it with a weaker or stronger choice and explain the changed effect.
The content description is the required target. The elaborations below are taught as examples and contexts, not as disconnected checklist wording.
Use a fresh example that has not been modelled. Ask the student to show the exact clue, feature or language choice and explain or use it independently.
The SkillrHub lesson remains the primary learning resource. This optional video reinforces the explanation; you can complete the lesson and practice without watching.
Before you watch:
Khan Academy — Support an evaluation with relevant evidence from a text; use the written lesson for visual and multimodal examples.
As you watch: What makes a quotation useful evidence rather than a decorative extra?
Load video player Loads YouTube in this lesson. See the video notice below.
Try it: Write a judgement about a text you are reading, add brief evidence and explain how it supports your judgement.
Video unavailable, inaccurate or unsuitable for this year? Report a video problem to SkillrHub by email. You can continue with the written lesson and practice resources.
Videos are curated from trusted independent educational creators and played through YouTube. Rights remain with their respective owners. Inclusion does not imply that a creator or YouTube endorses SkillrHub.
YouTube’s terms and privacy policy apply to its player. Advertising, recommendations and external links may appear, and videos may change or become unavailable. SkillrHub’s written lessons and practice resources remain available separately.
To report a content, suitability or rights concern, email skillrhublearning@gmail.com with the lesson code and video link. Please do not include personal student information.
Mapped skill: recognise language used to evaluate texts including visual and multimodal texts, and how evaluations of a text can be substantiated by reference to the text and other sources
These references identify matching or closely related learning. Curriculum sequence, terminology and depth vary, so teachers should use the mapped skill and lesson difficulty to confirm suitability.
| Region | Curriculum framework | Closest level or code |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | Australian Curriculum v9.0 | AC9E7LA02 · Year 7 |
| Victoria | Victorian Curriculum F–10 Version 2.0 — English | VC2E7LA02 · Level 7 |
| New South Wales | NSW English K–10 Syllabus (2022) | EN4-URA-01 · Stage 4 |
| United States (USA) | Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts | Grade 7 |
| Canada (Ontario) | Ontario Curriculum — English | Grade 7 |
| United Kingdom (England) | National Curriculum in England — English | Year 8, Key Stage 3 |
| India | NCERT / CBSE — English | Class 7 |
Australian Curriculum v9.0 is the canonical source for this SkillrHub lesson. Victoria and NSW entries name the closest published state codes or outcomes; international entries are planning references rather than claims of identical curricula.
Help improve SkillrHub
Ask about this lesson, suggest an improvement or report an error. Facebook opens only when you choose an option below.
Topic reference: AC9E7LA02 — AC9E7LA02: Recognise language used to evaluate texts including visual and multimodal texts, and how evaluations of a text can be substantiated by reference to the text and other sources
Privacy: Please don’t share personal student or school information. Younger students should ask a parent, guardian or teacher to post on their behalf.
Explain a judgement about a text using a relevant feature and its effect.
Evaluate the sentence ‘The gate rattled. No one answered. Then a key scraped inside the lock.’ Does it build suspense?
Watch for this mistake: Retelling the events or saying ‘it is good’ does not substantiate an evaluation. Explain how an identified feature creates an effect.
Which supports an evaluation of suspense more directly: ‘I like mysteries’ or ‘The writer delays revealing who holds the key’? Explain.
Look for evidence about the text itself.
The second identifies a structural choice that delays information. The first states a personal preference.
The same scene is illustrated with the gate in deep shadow. How could this support an evaluation of the mood?
Connect the visual choice to its likely effect.
The shadow conceals detail and can make the scene feel uncertain or threatening; an alternative justified reading is acceptable.