Objective, subjective and biased language
Learning intention: Separate checkable information from judgement, then inspect wording, attribution, selection, omission, images and data before making a qualified judgement about bias.
- Model the feature in one short example.
- Ask students to name the exact evidence.
- Connect the evidence to meaning, purpose or clarity.
- Compare a correct and misleading interpretation.
- Guide a revision, then release students to a fresh example.
Model and guided checks
- objective statement: The survey recorded 186 responses. Ask: It reports a checkable quantity without adding approval or disapproval.
- subjective statement: The new timetable is a wonderful improvement. Ask: The adjective “wonderful” expresses the writer’s positive judgement.
- loaded language: The council dumped its disastrous plan on families. Ask: “Dumped” and “disastrous” push readers towards a negative response.
- attributed opinion: The coach said the new rule was unfair. Ask: The opinion is clearly assigned to the coach rather than presented as fact.
- selection bias: The article quotes four opponents but no supporters of the proposal. Ask: The chosen voices represent only one side of the issue.
- omission: A canteen advertisement states the snack is low in fat but leaves out its high sugar level. Ask: The missing information could change how readers judge the product.
Misconception check: Photographs are automatically objective evidence. Students must use evidence to repair the claim.
Exit check: Identify the feature, cite evidence, explain its effect and make one justified revision.