AC9S3I05 • Year 3 Science

AC9S3I05: Compare findings with those of others, consider if investigations were fair, identify questions for further investigation and draw conclusions

compare findings with those of others, consider if investigations were fair, identify questions for further investigation and draw conclusions

What students learn in AC9S3I05

Students learn to compare findings with those of others, consider if investigations were fair, identify questions for further investigation and draw conclusions. They use the visual model, precise vocabulary and evidence to explain and apply the concept.

Learning routine: Observe → Model → Investigate → Record → Explain

Success looks like

  • Recognise finding
  • Use fair test
  • Explain conclusion
  • Apply in a new context
  • Justify with evidence
Key vocabulary
finding
a result or pattern identified from data
fair test
an investigation that controls relevant variables
conclusion
a statement answering the question using evidence
Concept models and worked thinking

Compare findings from two groups

GroupAverage melting timeA6 minB8 minC7 min

Use the labels and relationships in the model to explain the central idea.

  1. Read every label and identify what each quantity or feature represents.
  2. Describe the relationship shown by the model.
  3. Check that the conclusion answers the original question.

Use a fairness checklist

one changed factorsame controlssuitable measurementrepeated trialssafe method

Transfer the idea to a new example and justify the choice with evidence.

Apply the same relationship to the new context, then justify the answer using the labels and evidence shown.

Curriculum coverage and elaborations

The content description and elaborations below show the curriculum ideas taught in this unit. Items marked as teaching context support lesson planning.

  • Content description: compare findings with those of others, consider if investigations were fair, identify questions for further investigation and draw conclusions
  • E1: comparing findings, such as about best insulators, with those of others and identifying further questions based on differences in findings
  • E2: discussing the factors that make investigations fair and evaluating the fairness of their own and others’ investigations
  • E3: drawing conclusions based on consideration of their own and others’ findings
  • E4: identifying further questions for investigation based on observations, differences in findings or new ideas
Guided learning activities

1. Model and notice

Use the visual model to identify finding, then explain the important features.

GroupAverage melting timeA6 minB8 minC7 min

2. Apply and compare

Apply fair test to a new example and compare the result.

one changed factorsame controlssuitable measurementrepeated trialssafe method

3. Create and explain

Create an example using finding, fair test and conclusion.

findingfair testconclusion
Revision Notes

Core idea: Students learn to compare findings with those of others, consider if investigations were fair, identify questions for further investigation and draw conclusions. They use the visual model, precise vocabulary and evidence to explain and apply the concept.

Remember

  • Recognise finding
  • Use fair test
  • Explain conclusion
  • Apply in a new context
  • Justify with evidence

Important questions

  • Which feature most supports a fair comparison? Explain using the model or evidence above.
  • Complete the conclusion rule. Explain using the model or evidence above.
  • Explain compare findings from two groups. Explain using the model or evidence above.
  • Correct: Different result means someone is wrong. Explain using the model or evidence above.
How to use this unit

Read the topic guide and use the teacher slide for instruction. Students can then use the worksheet for written work, open Practice for supported feedback, or take the Test when they are ready.

AC9S3I05 teacher slide

Teacher resource

Use this one-page PDF to introduce the key idea, vocabulary and teaching sequence before students begin the activities.

Open Classroom View
Common misconceptions
  • Different result means someone is wrong — Chance variation or method differences may explain it.
  • Feature named without effect — Explain how the feature changes meaning or outcome.
  • One example treated as a rule — Test the idea with another example.
International curriculum mapping

This table gives closest-topic mapping for search and planning. The Australian Curriculum code is exact; overseas entries are broad equivalents because each jurisdiction structures outcomes differently.

RegionCurriculumClosest mapping
AustraliaAustralian Curriculum v9.0AC9S3I05 — compare findings with those of others, consider if investigations were fair, identify questions for further investigation and draw conclusions
VictoriaVictorian Curriculum F-10Year 3 Science: closest match in Evaluating. Use this page as a VIC-aligned practice and worksheet reference.
NSWNSW CurriculumStage 2 Science: closest content focus for Compare findings with those of others, consider if investigations were fair, identify questions for further investigation and draw conclusions and related outcomes.
United StatesCommon Core / NGSSGrade 3 NGSS science closest topic match for Compare findings with those of others, consider if investigations were fair, identify questions for further investigation and draw conclusions.
England / UKNational CurriculumKey Stage 2 / Year 3: closest programme-of-study match for Compare findings with those of others, consider if investigations were fair, identify questions for further investigation and draw conclusions.
CanadaProvincial and territory curriculaGrade 3 closest topic match. Canada varies by province, so use this as a broad Ontario/BC-style learning outcome reference.
New ZealandNew Zealand CurriculumLevel 2 Science: closest achievement-objective topic for Compare findings with those of others, consider if investigations were fair, identify questions for further investigation and draw conclusions.
IndiaNCERT / CBSEClass 3 closest NCERT/CBSE topic match for Compare findings with those of others, consider if investigations were fair, identify questions for further investigation and draw conclusions.
🎥 Optional Video Lesson

The SkillrHub lesson remains the primary learning resource. This optional video reinforces the explanation; you can complete the lesson and practice without watching.

Back to the lesson

Before you watch:

  • Pause after each worked example.
  • Try the examples yourself.
  • Return to the SkillrHub lesson before continuing.
Recommended: Testing and Trials: Crash Course Kids #44.2

Crash Course Kids — Think about repeated tests and how to improve an investigation.

As you watch: What could you change in a test plan to make a comparison more useful?

Load video player Loads YouTube in this lesson. See the video notice below.

Try it: Compare two groups' results from the same safe investigation. Name one similarity, one difference and a question to investigate next.

Video unavailable, inaccurate or unsuitable for this year? Report a video problem to SkillrHub by email. You can continue with the written lesson and practice resources.

About these videos

Videos are curated from trusted independent educational creators and played through YouTube. Rights remain with their respective owners. Inclusion does not imply that a creator or YouTube endorses SkillrHub.

YouTube’s terms and privacy policy apply to its player. Advertising, recommendations and external links may appear, and videos may change or become unavailable. SkillrHub’s written lessons and practice resources remain available separately.

To report a content, suitability or rights concern, email skillrhublearning@gmail.com with the lesson code and video link. Please do not include personal student information.

Curriculum equivalents: Victoria, NSW and international

Curriculum equivalents for Findings with those of others, consider if investigations were fair...

Mapped skill: compare findings with those of others, consider if investigations were fair, identify questions for further investigation and draw conclusions

These references identify matching or closely related learning. Curriculum sequence, terminology and depth vary, so teachers should use the mapped skill and lesson difficulty to confirm suitability.

RegionCurriculum frameworkClosest level or code
AustraliaAustralian Curriculum v9.0AC9S3I05 · Year 3
VictoriaVictorian Curriculum F–10 Version 2.0 — ScienceVC2S4I05 · Levels 3–4
New South WalesNSW Science and Technology K–6 Syllabus (2024)ST2-DAT-01 + ST2-PQU-01 · Stage 2
United States (USA)Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS)Grade 3
Canada (Ontario)Ontario Curriculum — ScienceGrade 3
United Kingdom (England)National Curriculum in England — ScienceYear 4, Key Stage 2
IndiaNCERT / CBSE — ScienceClass 3

Australian Curriculum v9.0 is the canonical source for this SkillrHub lesson. Victoria and NSW entries name the closest published state codes or outcomes; international entries are planning references rather than claims of identical curricula.

Help improve SkillrHub

Questions or feedback?

Ask about this lesson, suggest an improvement or report an error. Facebook opens only when you choose an option below.

Topic reference: AC9S3I05 — AC9S3I05: Compare findings with those of others, consider if investigations were fair, identify questions for further investigation and draw conclusions

💬 Ask a question 💡 Suggest an improvement ⚠️ Report an error

Privacy: Please don’t share personal student or school information. Younger students should ask a parent, guardian or teacher to post on their behalf.

Official curriculum references
Related Year 3 Science topics