AC9S3I05: Compare findings with those of others, consider if investigations were fair, identify questions for further investigation and draw conclusions
compare findings with those of others, consider if investigations were fair, identify questions for further investigation and draw conclusions
Students learn to compare findings with those of others, consider if investigations were fair, identify questions for further investigation and draw conclusions. They use the visual model, precise vocabulary and evidence to explain and apply the concept.
Learning routine: Observe → Model → Investigate → Record → Explain
Success looks like
Recognise finding
Use fair test
Explain conclusion
Apply in a new context
Justify with evidence
Key vocabulary
finding
a result or pattern identified from data
fair test
an investigation that controls relevant variables
conclusion
a statement answering the question using evidence
Concept models and worked thinking
Compare findings from two groups
GroupAverage melting timeA6 minB8 minC7 min
Use the labels and relationships in the model to explain the central idea.
Read every label and identify what each quantity or feature represents.
Describe the relationship shown by the model.
Check that the conclusion answers the original question.
Use a fairness checklist
one changed factorsame controlssuitable measurementrepeated trialssafe method
Transfer the idea to a new example and justify the choice with evidence.
Apply the same relationship to the new context, then justify the answer using the labels and evidence shown.
Curriculum coverage and elaborations
The content description and elaborations below show the curriculum ideas taught in this unit. Items marked as teaching context support lesson planning.
Content description: compare findings with those of others, consider if investigations were fair, identify questions for further investigation and draw conclusions
E1: comparing findings, such as about best insulators, with those of others and identifying further questions based on differences in findings
E2: discussing the factors that make investigations fair and evaluating the fairness of their own and others’ investigations
E3: drawing conclusions based on consideration of their own and others’ findings
E4: identifying further questions for investigation based on observations, differences in findings or new ideas
Guided learning activities
1. Model and notice
Use the visual model to identify finding, then explain the important features.
GroupAverage melting timeA6 minB8 minC7 min
2. Apply and compare
Apply fair test to a new example and compare the result.
one changed factorsame controlssuitable measurementrepeated trialssafe method
3. Create and explain
Create an example using finding, fair test and conclusion.
findingfair testconclusion
Revision Notes
Core idea: Students learn to compare findings with those of others, consider if investigations were fair, identify questions for further investigation and draw conclusions. They use the visual model, precise vocabulary and evidence to explain and apply the concept.
Remember
Recognise finding
Use fair test
Explain conclusion
Apply in a new context
Justify with evidence
Important questions
Which feature most supports a fair comparison? Explain using the model or evidence above.
Complete the conclusion rule. Explain using the model or evidence above.
Explain compare findings from two groups. Explain using the model or evidence above.
Correct: Different result means someone is wrong. Explain using the model or evidence above.
How to use this unit
Read the topic guide and use the teacher slide for instruction. Students can then use the worksheet for written work, open Practice for supported feedback, or take the Test when they are ready.
AC9S3I05 teacher slide
Teacher resource
Use this one-page PDF to introduce the key idea, vocabulary and teaching sequence before students begin the activities.
Different result means someone is wrong — Chance variation or method differences may explain it.
Feature named without effect — Explain how the feature changes meaning or outcome.
One example treated as a rule — Test the idea with another example.
International curriculum mapping
This table gives closest-topic mapping for search and planning. The Australian Curriculum code is exact; overseas entries are broad equivalents because each jurisdiction structures outcomes differently.
Region
Curriculum
Closest mapping
Australia
Australian Curriculum v9.0
AC9S3I05 — compare findings with those of others, consider if investigations were fair, identify questions for further investigation and draw conclusions
Victoria
Victorian Curriculum F-10
Year 3 Science: closest match in Evaluating. Use this page as a VIC-aligned practice and worksheet reference.
NSW
NSW Curriculum
Stage 2 Science: closest content focus for Compare findings with those of others, consider if investigations were fair, identify questions for further investigation and draw conclusions and related outcomes.
United States
Common Core / NGSS
Grade 3 NGSS science closest topic match for Compare findings with those of others, consider if investigations were fair, identify questions for further investigation and draw conclusions.
England / UK
National Curriculum
Key Stage 2 / Year 3: closest programme-of-study match for Compare findings with those of others, consider if investigations were fair, identify questions for further investigation and draw conclusions.
Canada
Provincial and territory curricula
Grade 3 closest topic match. Canada varies by province, so use this as a broad Ontario/BC-style learning outcome reference.
New Zealand
New Zealand Curriculum
Level 2 Science: closest achievement-objective topic for Compare findings with those of others, consider if investigations were fair, identify questions for further investigation and draw conclusions.
India
NCERT / CBSE
Class 3 closest NCERT/CBSE topic match for Compare findings with those of others, consider if investigations were fair, identify questions for further investigation and draw conclusions.
🎥 Optional Video Lesson
The SkillrHub lesson remains the primary learning resource. This optional video reinforces the explanation; you can complete the lesson and practice without watching.
Recommended: Testing and Trials: Crash Course Kids #44.2
Crash Course Kids — Think about repeated tests and how to improve an investigation.
As you watch: What could you change in a test plan to make a comparison more useful?
Load video playerLoads YouTube in this lesson. See the video notice below.
Try it: Compare two groups' results from the same safe investigation. Name one similarity, one difference and a question to investigate next.
Video unavailable, inaccurate or unsuitable for this year? Report a video problem to SkillrHub by email. You can continue with the written lesson and practice resources.
About these videos
Videos are curated from trusted independent educational creators and played through YouTube. Rights remain with their respective owners. Inclusion does not imply that a creator or YouTube endorses SkillrHub.
YouTube’s terms and privacy policy apply to its player. Advertising, recommendations and external links may appear, and videos may change or become unavailable. SkillrHub’s written lessons and practice resources remain available separately.
To report a content, suitability or rights concern, email skillrhublearning@gmail.com with the lesson code and video link. Please do not include personal student information.
Curriculum equivalents: Victoria, NSW and international
Curriculum equivalents for Findings with those of others, consider if investigations were fair...
Mapped skill: compare findings with those of others, consider if investigations were fair, identify questions for further investigation and draw conclusions
These references identify matching or closely related learning. Curriculum sequence, terminology and depth vary, so teachers should use the mapped skill and lesson difficulty to confirm suitability.
Australian Curriculum v9.0 is the canonical source for this SkillrHub lesson. Victoria and NSW entries name the closest published state codes or outcomes; international entries are planning references rather than claims of identical curricula.
Help improve SkillrHub
Questions or feedback?
Ask about this lesson, suggest an improvement or report an error. Facebook opens only when you choose an option below.
Topic reference: AC9S3I05 — AC9S3I05: Compare findings with those of others, consider if investigations were fair, identify questions for further investigation and draw conclusions