AC9E6LY05 • Year 6 English

AC9E6LY05: Use comprehension strategies such as visualising, predicting, connecting, summarising, monitoring and questioning to build literal and inferred meaning, and to connect and compare content from a variety of sources

use comprehension strategies such as visualising, predicting, connecting, summarising, monitoring and questioning to build literal and inferred meaning, and to connect and compare content from a variety of sources

What students learn in AC9E6LY05

Students learn to use comprehension strategies such as visualising, predicting, connecting, summarising, monitoring and questioning to build literal and inferred meaning, and to connect and compare content from a variety of sources. They move from recognising the feature to explaining how it works in context, then applying it deliberately in their own reading, speaking, writing or multimodal creation.

Core idea: In English, choices in language, structure, literature and mode create meaning for a particular audience and purpose. A strong answer names the choice, gives evidence and explains the effect.

Success looks like

  • identify the relevant feature, strategy or text choice
  • use precise English metalanguage
  • support the answer with specific evidence
  • explain the effect in context
  • apply or revise the choice for a new audience and purpose
Key vocabulary
mode
a channel of meaning such as words, image, sound, gesture, layout or movement
salience
how strongly an element attracts attention
sequence
the order in which ideas or images are presented

Use these terms only when they help explain the actual example. Avoid dropping metalanguage into an answer without showing the evidence.

Concept model and worked thinking

Use the evidence-to-effect routine

What to noticeHow to test itEvidence of mastery
use comprehension strategies such as visualising, predicting, connecting, summarising, monitoring and questioning to build literal and inferred meaning, and to connect and compare content from a variety of sourcesuse comprehension strategies such as visualising, predicting, connecting, summarising, monitoring and questioning to build literal and inferred meaning, and to connect and compare content from a variety of sourcesstudent explains the effect or reason
second contextapply the same idea in a new textstudent transfers the idea
checkexplain the effect with evidencestudent justifies with precise evidence
  1. Name the feature, strategy or choice.
  2. Quote, describe or point to the exact evidence.
  3. Explain what the evidence does for meaning, clarity, representation, relationship or audience response.
  4. Check the explanation against the purpose of the whole text or task.

Worked transfer

Take an unseen example linked to this outcome. First identify the relevant choice, then rewrite, annotate, compare or present it in a second context so the idea is not only memorised.

Teacher prompt: What changed, what stayed the same, and how do you know the new version still suits the audience and purpose?

Curriculum coverage and elaborations

Content description: use comprehension strategies such as visualising, predicting, connecting, summarising, monitoring and questioning to build literal and inferred meaning, and to connect and compare content from a variety of sources

  • Descriptor focus: use comprehension strategies such as visualising, predicting, connecting, summarising, monitoring and questioning to build literal and inferred meaning, and to connect and compare content from a variety of sources
Common misconceptions
  • Visuals are decoration — Images, layout, sound and sequence can carry essential meaning.
  • One feature has one fixed effect — Explain the effect in this context and with the surrounding text.
  • Modes analysed separately only — Show how words, images and sound reinforce, extend or challenge each other.
  • Accessibility ignored — Captions, labels and clear layout help audiences access meaning.
Guided learning activities

1. Annotate a model example

Students highlight the exact words, sentence parts, text features, visual choices or spoken moves connected to the descriptor.

2. Compare two versions

Students compare a weaker and stronger version, then explain which choices improve meaning, clarity, credibility, cohesion or audience effect.

3. Create, justify and revise

Students create a short response or text using the focus skill, justify the key choice and revise one part after feedback.

Revision Notes

Exam routine: feature or strategy → evidence → effect → context → check.

Important questions

  • Identify the exact feature or strategy in use comprehension strategies such as visualising, predicting, connecting, summarising, monitoring and questioning to build literal and inferred meaning, and to connect and compare content from a variety of sources. Answer with precise evidence and a short explanation.
  • Point to the evidence that supports the answer. Answer with precise evidence and a short explanation.
  • Explain how the choice changes meaning, effect, clarity or audience response. Answer with precise evidence and a short explanation.
  • Apply the idea in a fresh sentence, text extract, discussion or multimodal example. Answer with precise evidence and a short explanation.
  • Revise one answer or created text using the success criteria. Answer with precise evidence and a short explanation.
Support, core and extend
  • Support: provide a short model, limited choices and sentence stems such as “The feature is …”, “The evidence is …”, and “This affects meaning by …”.
  • Core: use an unseen example and require evidence plus a context-specific explanation.
  • Extend: compare two texts, modes, audiences or drafts and evaluate which choices are most effective.
AC9E6LY05 Teacher Slides

Project the fixed branded slide deck one slide at a time. Use it with the same evidence-to-effect routine taught in this topic guide.

Open Classroom View
How to use this unit

Learn from the Topic Guide and fixed Teacher Slides, complete the Worksheet, use Practice for supported feedback, then take the Test when ready.

🎥 Optional Video Lesson

The SkillrHub lesson remains the primary learning resource. This optional video reinforces the explanation; you can complete the lesson and practice without watching.

Back to the lesson

Before you watch:

  • Pause after each worked example.
  • Try the examples yourself.
  • Return to the SkillrHub lesson before continuing.
Recommended: How to Make Inferences

Khan Academy — Combine textual clues and relevant knowledge to make an inference.

As you watch: Which part of the interpretation comes from a clue, and which part comes from what the reader already knows?

Load video player Loads YouTube in this lesson. See the video notice below.

Try it: Make one inference from a text, cite two clues and compare it with information from another source.

Video unavailable, inaccurate or unsuitable for this year? Report a video problem to SkillrHub by email. You can continue with the written lesson and practice resources.

About these videos

Videos are curated from trusted independent educational creators and played through YouTube. Rights remain with their respective owners. Inclusion does not imply that a creator or YouTube endorses SkillrHub.

YouTube’s terms and privacy policy apply to its player. Advertising, recommendations and external links may appear, and videos may change or become unavailable. SkillrHub’s written lessons and practice resources remain available separately.

To report a content, suitability or rights concern, email skillrhublearning@gmail.com with the lesson code and video link. Please do not include personal student information.

Curriculum equivalents: Victoria, NSW and international

Curriculum equivalents for Comprehension strategies such as visualising, predicting, connecting, summarising, monitoring and...

Mapped skill: use comprehension strategies such as visualising, predicting, connecting, summarising, monitoring and questioning to build literal and inferred meaning, and to connect and compare content from a variety of sources

These references identify matching or closely related learning. Curriculum sequence, terminology and depth vary, so teachers should use the mapped skill and lesson difficulty to confirm suitability.

RegionCurriculum frameworkClosest level or code
AustraliaAustralian Curriculum v9.0AC9E6LY05 · Year 6
VictoriaVictorian Curriculum F–10 Version 2.0 — EnglishVC2E6LY05 · Level 6
New South WalesNSW English K–10 Syllabus (2022)EN3-RECOM-01 · Stage 3
United States (USA)Common Core State Standards for English Language ArtsGrade 6
Canada (Ontario)Ontario Curriculum — EnglishGrade 6
United Kingdom (England)National Curriculum in England — EnglishYear 7, Key Stage 3
IndiaNCERT / CBSE — EnglishClass 6

Australian Curriculum v9.0 is the canonical source for this SkillrHub lesson. Victoria and NSW entries name the closest published state codes or outcomes; international entries are planning references rather than claims of identical curricula.

Help improve SkillrHub

Questions or feedback?

Ask about this lesson, suggest an improvement or report an error. Facebook opens only when you choose an option below.

Topic reference: AC9E6LY05 — AC9E6LY05: Use comprehension strategies such as visualising, predicting, connecting, summarising, monitoring and questioning to build literal and inferred meaning, and to connect and compare content from a variety of sources

💬 Ask a question 💡 Suggest an improvement ⚠️ Report an error

Privacy: Please don’t share personal student or school information. Younger students should ask a parent, guardian or teacher to post on their behalf.

Official curriculum references
Related Year 6 English topics

Learn: Comprehension strategies across sources

Learning intention: Use predicting, visualising, connecting, questioning, summarising, inferring and monitoring before, during and after reading, then compare and synthesise evidence across sources.

How to think

  1. Name the precise strategy or choice.
  2. Point to exact evidence.
  3. Explain how it serves meaning, audience or purpose.
  4. Check the claim against the whole task.
  5. Apply or revise deliberately.
StrategyOriginal exampleWhy it works
predictingFrom the title “When the River Turned Brown” and a pollution photograph, I predict the text will explain contamination.The prediction uses available evidence and remains open to revision.
visualisingThe description of narrow roots twisting through dark mud forms a mental image of a mangrove habitat.Visualising connects sensory details and spatial relationships.
connectingA reader connects a new explanation of evaporation to an earlier water-cycle diagram.The relevant text-to-text connection activates knowledge that clarifies the process.
questioningWhy did the author present the survey result before explaining the sample?The question directs attention to structure, evidence and possible positioning.
literal meaningThe report states that 42 seedlings survived the first month.Literal comprehension retrieves information directly stated in the source.
inferenceThe empty water bowl, dusty paws and repeated pacing suggest the dog is thirsty.Several textual clues combine with reasonable knowledge to support an unstated meaning.
summarisingThe paragraph explains that shade lowers water temperature and protects young fish.The summary preserves the central cause and effect while omitting minor detail.
monitoringJada notices that her explanation conflicts with the graph and rereads the axis labels.Detecting a mismatch triggers a repair strategy.
comparing sourcesA news article highlights disruption; a council report provides costs and timelines.Comparing reveals different purposes, emphases and useful evidence.
corroboratingTwo independent sources report the same date, while a blog gives no source.Agreement between credible independent evidence strengthens confidence in the detail.
synthesisingThe map shows affected areas, the graph shows change over time and interviews explain community impact.Synthesis combines different contributions into a fuller understanding.
strategy flexibilityWhen a procedure becomes confusing, Sam stops predicting and traces each diagrammed step.Effective readers choose strategies that fit the text and the comprehension problem.

Common mistakes

  • One source must be entirely correct and the other wrong. Replace the absolute rule with an evidence-based explanation.
  • Repeated claims online automatically become true. Replace the absolute rule with an evidence-based explanation.
  • Synthesis means placing three summaries beside one another. Replace the absolute rule with an evidence-based explanation.
  • Every reader should use all strategies in the same order. Replace the absolute rule with an evidence-based explanation.

Check your understanding

Apply the strategy to an unfamiliar text or communication task. Name the choice, cite evidence, explain its effect and justify one improvement.