Learning intention: After an investigation, compare the prediction with the observation. A different result is useful because it helps us update our thinking.
Success looks like: Recall prediction; State observation; Compare same/different; Use evidence; Update thinking.
Learning routine: Recall prediction → Observe result → Compare → Say same/different → Learn
Explain, check and applyReason
Keep both parts of the comparison
With adult guidance, put the original prediction beside the observation. Say what was expected, what was actually noticed and whether they match. A different result is useful; do not rewrite the prediction to make it correct.
Compare the same feature
Prediction: the plant will have a flower. Observation: the plant has green leaves. Is that enough to decide whether the prediction matched?
Answer and teaching guidance
Not yet. The observation does not say whether a flower was present. Look at the plant and record the feature named in the prediction before comparing.
A different result is still evidence
Before a garden visit, a child predicts three birds on a branch. They observe one bird. What should go in the comparison?
Answer and teaching guidance
Predicted three birds; observed one bird; different. Keep both records. Do not add imagined birds to the observation or erase the original prediction.
Some parts can match
Prediction: the plant will have four leaves and a flower. Observation: four leaves and no flower. What matched, and what differed?
Answer and teaching guidance
The leaf count matched. The flower prediction did not match. With guidance, compare each feature separately rather than calling the whole prediction right or wrong.
Ready to move on
Use the supplied sentence: “I predicted ____. I observed ____. They matched/differed because ____.” Prediction: two birds. Observation: two birds.
Answer and teaching guidance
The number matched: two were predicted and two observed. Accept a spoken or drawn response with adult recording. For a new example, change the observation and compare again.
👀 Model and worked examplesLearn
Prediction and observation have different jobs
Prediction: “The large marble will roll farther.” Observation: “The small marble rolled farther.” Compare: The observation was different from the prediction.
Think aloud: Describe what is observed first, then use that evidence to explain the idea.
Use evidence, not embarrassment
We do not change the prediction after the test. We keep it, record the observation and explain whether they matched.
📚 Key words4 words
prediction
what we thought would happen
observation
what we actually noticed
compare
identify what matched and what differed
evidence
the observation used to explain
🧠 Try it in different waysApply
1. Match or different?
Read a prediction and an observation. Decide whether they match.
2. Evidence sentence
Complete: “I predicted ____. I observed ____. They were the same/different.”
3. Update thinking
Say one thing you learned from a result that was different from your prediction.
⚠️ Common mistakes and fixesFix errors
Changing the old prediction: Keep the original prediction so the comparison is honest.
Calling a wrong prediction a failure: A different result still gives useful evidence.
Comparing without stating the observation: Say what actually happened before deciding whether it matched.
✅ Quick checkCheck
What do we compare after an investigation?
Can a prediction be different from the observation?
Why keep the original prediction?
Write a sentence comparing a prediction and result.
Ready for Practice when: Recall prediction; State observation; Compare same/different; Use evidence; Update thinking.
📝 Revision NotesRemember
Main idea: After an investigation, compare the prediction with the observation. A different result is useful because it helps us update our thinking.
Useful routine: Recall prediction → Observe result → Compare → Say same/different → Learn
prediction: what we thought would happen
observation: what we actually noticed
compare: identify what matched and what differed
evidence: the observation used to explain
Best self-check: explain one new example without copying the worked model.
🇦🇺 Australian Curriculum coverageE1–E3
Content description: compare observations with predictions with guidance
These are curriculum teaching examples used as a breadth check, not separate mandatory outcomes.
E1
revisiting their predictions and with guidance identifying whether their predictions matched their observations
Teaching example: Place the original prediction beside the observation. With guidance, compare the named feature and keep both records even when they differ.
E2
comparing, with guidance, observations of plants or animals made during field work with their predictions
Teaching example: Before and after a garden visit, record the predicted and observed number of birds. Compare only what was actually observed during the stated visit.
E3
using a provided table to draw or dictate their prediction and their observation and identifying whether they are the same or different
Teaching example: Provide Prediction / Observation / Match or different headings. Children draw or dictate each entry; help them explain the comparison using the recorded feature.
Teacher resource
AC9SFI04 fixed teacher slides
The authored presentation uses the same models, vocabulary and checks as this lesson.
The SkillrHub lesson remains the primary learning resource. This optional video reinforces the explanation; you can complete the lesson and practice without watching.
Planet Nutshell — Comparing what you expected with what you observed.
As you watch: Did the result match the prediction?
Load video playerLoads YouTube in this lesson. See the video notice below.
Try it: After a simple toy-car test, finish these spoken ideas with an adult: I thought... I saw... They were the same or different because...
Video unavailable, inaccurate or unsuitable for this year? Report a video problem to SkillrHub by email. You can continue with the written lesson and practice resources.
About these videos
Videos are curated from trusted independent educational creators and played through YouTube. Rights remain with their respective owners. Inclusion does not imply that a creator or YouTube endorses SkillrHub.
YouTube’s terms and privacy policy apply to its player. Advertising, recommendations and external links may appear, and videos may change or become unavailable. SkillrHub’s written lessons and practice resources remain available separately.
To report a content, suitability or rights concern, email skillrhublearning@gmail.com with the lesson code and video link. Please do not include personal student information.
Curriculum equivalents: Victoria, NSW and international
Curriculum equivalents for Observations with predictions with guidance
Mapped skill: compare observations with predictions with guidance
These references identify matching or closely related learning. Curriculum sequence, terminology and depth vary, so teachers should use the mapped skill and lesson difficulty to confirm suitability.
Australian Curriculum v9.0 is the canonical source for this SkillrHub lesson. Victoria and NSW entries name the closest published state codes or outcomes; international entries are planning references rather than claims of identical curricula.
Help improve SkillrHub
Questions or feedback?
Ask about this lesson, suggest an improvement or report an error. Facebook opens only when you choose an option below.
Topic reference: AC9SFI04 — AC9SFI04: Compare Predictions and Observations